Interested in becoming a member? 614.481.6949

mahma@caahq.com

HUD's Proposed Rule to Streamline Funding Requirements for Section 202 and 811 Programs

HUD has published its proposed rule on “Streamlining Requirements Governing the Use of Funding for Supportive Housing for the Elderly and Persons With Disabilities Programs” (March 28, 2012, Docket No. FR-5167-P-01).

 

The proposed rule would amend HUD’s regulations governing the Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly Program (Section 202) and the Section 811 Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities Program (Section 811), by streamlining the requirements for mixed-finance Section 202 and Section 811 developments. This rule would streamline the requirements for mixed-finance developments by removing restrictions on the portions of developments not funded through capital advances, thereby lifting barriers on participation in the development of the projects, and eliminating burdensome funding requirements.

 

 

 

HUD believes that these proposed amendments will attract private capital and the expertise of the private developer community to create attractive and affordable supportive housing developments for the elderly and for persons with disabilities.

 

HUD is also using the proposed rule as an opportunity to improve and bring up to date certain regulations governing all Section 202 and Section 811 developments. These changes will permit broader flexibility in the design of Section 202/811 units, extend the duration of the availability of capital advance funds, and make a technical correction.

 

The proposed rule is part of HUD’s efforts to implement changes made to the Section 202 and 811 programs by the  Frank Melville Supportive Housing Investment Act of 2010 and the Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly Act of 2010. A subsequent rule, which will focus on the statutory changes, is expected to be published later in 2012.

 

A copy of the proposed rule may be found here: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-03-28/pdf/2012-7316.pdf

Leave a Reply